The Damage Charities Do

The damage charities do can no longer be overlooked or brushed under the carpet.

Top-down charity has become a staple here in the US, and even abroad.  Top Down Charity is where despicable folks use an outside charity to mask their true character.

Often, it's a hollow gesture, one that only extends to the point of necessity in order to secure the proper look the celebrity is going for.

Most celebrities will claim to be a farmer just because their parents and grandparents toiled on a farm their entire lives trying to eek out a modest living for themselves and their families, while they themselves can't do anything more than take a few uncomfortable photos with some unsuspecting animals.

Still, they will proclaim - and folks who want to believe in something good will go along with it.

These wealthy 'elite' claim to have personal reasons for whichever charity they use as an umbrella to hide and protect them from revealing who they really are deep down.

It's as old as Rome itself, and probably older, this ploy to win the hearts and minds of folks, by being seen kissing babies and holding animals - all while working a deceitful tyranny behind the scenes.

As an accountant, I was asked more than once to find ways to hide and obfuscate income.  My first experience with it was at Six Pack Shortcuts in Austin, Texas, working for Daniel Rose and his business partner, I forget his name now.  Several meetings were called for me to go over their various 'legal' options to keep more of their money tax free.  At the time Six Pack Shortcuts was the number 1 YouTube fitness channel in the world.

Charitable LLCs, as it turns out, is one of the top ways celebrities hide and shuffle money.  (Just like Ashton Kutcher and Thorn - from what I understand, so far they have brought in $21 million of which $18 million went to pay staff salaries - and now their facial recognition software is being sold on the open market.  Not that it ever saved trafficked kids, as they tried to tell us it did in their marketing spin.)

I quit Six Pack Shortcuts shortly thereafter, as it became increasingly clear they were not going to run the business above board, even with their supplement line.

Mind you, it was no small thing for me to quit, as I hadn't any money to my name at the time, and I was already feeling serious ill after-effects of my mommy-make-over (a tummy tuck and breast implant) surgery. 

You see, I was allergic to the implants, and had a constant infection near my umbilicus because the surgeon used metal staples even though she'd been told I was highly allergic to stainless steal and nickle.

No doubt she has a charity she donates to which she thinks makes up for her incompetence.

And isn't that the whole problem in a nutshell? 

Celebrities and other folks with power continually seek to overshadow their lack of responsibility, accountability, and integrity, by simply giving to charities - most often as loudly and as vociferously as possible.

And then there are the covert narcs, like Keanu Reeves, who swears he's one of the only good guys in Hollywood, because he lets leak out his large donations to children with cancer. 

Yet WAY MORE kids die here in the US due to firearms than cancer - and who makes most of his money selling apathetic violence and justified white male rage???  Keanu Reeves.

Gaslighting is when folks repeat over and over how much a hero Mr. Reeves is - all while he is actively exploiting the very worst of our society, actively putting more and more people in danger.

His silence on gun violence - while feeding well documented money to children with cancer - - is gaslighting.  And it is disgusting.

(The fact we need charities to cover children with cancer - while we send trillions overseas to help kill even more people - is another topic all together, and one I will no doubt get to soon.)

The fact is, under today's oligarchy rule, We The People have given all of our power away to despicable folks who use desperate OR despicable charities to present to the populous an image that is at least some-what tolerable.

I mean... really... is there a single male actor, director, or producer who knows how to tell a story without violence?  Without white male rage?

Diddy hid in plain sight, forgiven a thousand blatant slip-ups, because charities allowed him to hide his true nature.  To obscure his true intent.

By allowing a person who has done nothing of actual merit to use the desperation of other folks to further their careers we are telling EVERYONE that our morals are for sale.

The truth is, Keanu Reeves has contributed to the apathetic violence that has taken over our society, taken over everyone's conditioned programming, way more than he has contributed to saving kids from cancer.

The cancer on our society is men like Keanu, who use trickery, gaslighting, and silence to kill as many dreams and hopes as possible.

Guns don't kill kids, it's the isolation, the mental conditioning, the lack of belonging in a society that is chock full of rageful, angry, viscous millionaire men.

Other celebrities are equally guilty, as they push their intoxicants down all of their fans' throats.  Every single celebrity has their own liquor brand now, because they are all complicit in the intentional exploitation and downfall of our society.

While good people struggle to keep their kids sober in a society that constantly tells them the only way to have fun is by imbibing, the folks we pay to entertain us are working diligently against us, trying their best to indoctrinate our kids into a society where morals don't matter, that the only thing that matters is the constant up-selling and subsequent profiting from ruining lives.

Hollywood has not been a free market since before the 50s, it is controlled by a small handful of folks who decided long ago what kinds of people get promoted, what kinds of stories get told. 

Hollywood is a tool of indoctrination and conditioning and little else.  And we have all stood by and clapped.

Because of the thousands of voices telling us 'But... they give to kids with cancer'.

When you step back from it - after a bit - after your eyes refocus - it's plain as day.  Right there in your face.

Their actions don't match their words.

My alcoholic ex-husband used to love to use the cliche "The road to hell is paved with good intentions" as a way to get out of acting right in the first place.  To his mind he was gonna go to hell no matter what, so he might as well earn his passage there.

Personally, I just think he's evil.

(Evil = willing to harm others for personal gain. Just like the hero nurse in Knives Out, BWT)

However, I see there is some truth to what he was saying, now... now that I've been exposed to the actual actions these so-called celebrities make.

You see... charities that allow horrendous people to hide behind them (while possibly mostly motivated by good intentions) are actively paving their own road to hell.

Not because some deity will condemn them.

Rather, because the more this type of cover up is normalized, the more it is a common thing, the fewer decent, moral, upstanding folks will exist in the world. 

Eventually this behavior would lead us all to hell.

And I think we can all see it now... with Diddy... and all of his accomplices. 

How he bathed in the light of charity all while openly destroying people's lives.

Are the charities to blame? 

Yeah. 

They are. 

And we all need to make sure they know it.



by Exe

---

---